The Danger Of Leftism > 자유게시판

The resulting influx of leftish sorts can simply turn a non-leftist movement right into a leftist one, in order that leftist goals exchange or distort the original targets of the movement.

214 To avoid this, a movement that exalts nature and opposes expertise should take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must keep away from all collaboration with leftists. Leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of trendy technology. Leftism is collectivist; it seeks to bind collectively your entire world (both nature and the human race) into a unified complete. But this suggests management of nature and of human life by organized society, and it requires superior expertise. You cannot have a united world without rapid transportation and communication, you can't make all individuals love one another without refined psychological strategies, you cannot have a "planned society" with out the mandatory technological base. Above all, leftism is driven by the necessity for power, and the leftist seeks energy on a collective foundation, by identification with a mass movement or a corporation. Leftism is unlikely ever to quit technology, as a result of expertise is too useful a source of collective power.

215 The anarchist[34] too seeks power, however he seeks it on a person or small-group basis; he needs individuals and small teams to be in a position to manage the circumstances of their very own lives. He opposes know-how as a result of it makes small groups dependent on large organizations.

216 Some leftists could appear to oppose technology, however they are going to oppose it only so long as they are outsiders and the technological system is managed by non-leftists. If leftism ever turns into dominant in society, in order that the technological system turns into a device within the fingers of leftists, they'll enthusiastically use it and promote its progress. In doing this they will be repeating a sample that leftism has shown time and again previously. When the Bolsheviks in Russia have been outsiders, they vigorously opposed censorship and the key police, they advocated self-determination for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more ruthless secret police than any that had existed underneath the tsars, and so they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much because the tsars had carried out. Within the United States, a few many years ago when leftists had been a minority in our universities, leftist professors have been vigorous proponents of educational freedom, however right this moment, in these of our universities where leftists have grow to be dominant, they've shown themselves ready to take away from everybody else's educational freedom. (That is "political correctness.") The identical will happen with leftists and expertise: They may use it to oppress everybody else if they ever get it below their own management.

217 In earlier revolutions, leftists of the most power-hungry kind, repeatedly, have first cooperated with non-leftist revolutionaries, as well as with leftists of a more libertarian inclination, and later have double-crossed them to grab power for themselves. Robespierre did this within the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks did it in the Russian Revolution, the communists did it in Spain in 1938 and Castro and his followers did it in Cuba. Given the past history of leftism, it would be completely foolish for non-leftist revolutionaries today to collaborate with leftists.

218 Various thinkers have identified that leftism is a kind of religion. Leftism just isn't a religion in the strict sense as a result of leftist doctrine doesn't postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role very like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist Must imagine in leftism; it plays a significant function in his psychological economic system. His beliefs are usually not easily modified by logic or details. He has a deep conviction that leftism is morally Right with a capital R, and that he has not only a right however a duty to impose leftist morality on everybody. (However, many of the people we're referring to as "leftists" don't think of themselves as leftists and wouldn't describe their system of beliefs as leftism. We use the time period "leftism" as a result of we don't know of any better words to designate the spectrum of related creeds that includes the feminist, gay rights, political correctness, and so forth., movements, and because these movements have a strong affinity with the old left. See paragraphs 227-230.)

219 Leftism is a totalitarian drive. Wherever leftism is able of power it tends to invade every private nook and drive every thought into a leftist mold. Partially that is due to the quasi-religious character of leftism; everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian power due to the leftists' drive for energy. The leftist seeks to satisfy his want for energy via identification with a social motion and he tries to go through the ability course of by helping to pursue and attain the targets of the movement (see paragraph 83). But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is rarely happy, because his activism is a surrogate exercise (see paragraph 41). That's, the leftists' real motive will not be to attain the ostensible objectives of leftism; in reality he's motivated by the sense of energy he gets from struggling for after which reaching a social objective.[35] Consequently the leftist is rarely happy with the objectives he has already attained; his want for the power course of leads him always to pursue some new purpose. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And so long as anybody harbors in some nook of his mind a negative perspective towards some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities aren't enough; nobody may be allowed to have a destructive angle toward homosexuals, disabled folks, fat people, outdated people, ugly individuals, and on and on and on. It's not sufficient that the general public must be informed in regards to the hazards of smoking; a warning needs to be stamped on each package deal of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be glad until tobacco is outlawed, and after that will probably be alcohol, then junk food, and so on. Activists have fought gross baby abuse, which is reasonable. But now they want to cease all spanking. When they have performed that they are going to wish to ban one thing else they consider unwholesome, then another thing after which another. They won't ever be glad till they have full control over all youngster rearing practices. And then they will transfer on to a different trigger.

220 Suppose you asked leftists to make an inventory of All of the issues that have been mistaken with society, and then suppose you instituted Every social change that they demanded. It's safe to say that within a couple of years nearly all of leftists would discover one thing new to complain about, some new social "evil" to appropriate as a result of, as soon as again, the leftist is motivated much less by distress at society's ills than by the necessity to fulfill his drive for energy by imposing his solutions on society.

221 Due to the restrictions positioned on their thoughts and behavior by their excessive degree of socialization, many leftists of the over-socialized sort cannot pursue power in the ways in which other individuals do. For them the drive for energy has only one morally acceptable outlet, and that is in the battle to impose their morality on everybody.

222 Leftists, particularly those of the oversocialized kind, are True Believers in the sense of Eric Hoffer's e book, "The True Believer." But not all True Believers are of the identical psychological type as leftists. Presumably a real-believing nazi, for instance, could be very totally different psychologically from a true-believing leftist. Because of their capability for single-minded devotion to a trigger, True Believers are a helpful, perhaps a crucial, ingredient of any revolutionary movement. This presents an issue with which we should admit we don't know easy methods to deal. We aren't positive how to harness the energies of the True Believer to a revolution in opposition to know-how. At current all we are able to say is that no True Believer will make a secure recruit to the revolution unless his dedication is completely to the destruction of expertise. If he is dedicated additionally to another excellent, he may want to use expertise as a device for pursuing that other perfect (see paragraphs 220, 221).

223 Some readers may say, "This stuff about leftism is lots of crap. I do know John and Jane who are leftish types they usually don't have all these totalitarian tendencies." It's quite true that many leftists, presumably even a numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely consider in tolerating others' values (up to a degree) and wouldn't need to make use of excessive-handed methods to achieve their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are usually not meant to use to every particular person leftist however to explain the overall character of leftism as a motion. And the general character of a motion isn't essentially decided by the numerical proportions of the varied sorts of people involved within the movement.

224 The individuals who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of probably the most energy-hungry kind, because power-hungry people are those who attempt hardest to get into positions of power. Once the facility-hungry sorts have captured management of the movement, there are lots of leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but can not bring themselves to oppose them. They Need their faith within the movement, and since they can not hand over this faith they go together with the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they often lose, as a result of the facility-hungry sorts are higher organized, are extra ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to construct themselves a robust power base.

225 These phenomena appeared clearly in Russia and different countries that have been taken over by leftists. Similarly, before the breakdown of communism within the USSR, leftish sorts in the West would seldom criticize that country. If prodded they might admit that the USSR did many fallacious issues, however then they'd attempt to search out excuses for the communists and start talking about the faults of the West. They at all times opposed Western army resistance to communist aggression. Leftish sorts all over the world vigorously protested the U.S. army motion in Vietnam, but when the USSR invaded Afghanistan they did nothing. Not that they approved of the Soviet actions; however because of their leftist religion, they just couldn't bear to put themselves in opposition to communism. Today, in these of our universities the place "political correctness" has change into dominant, there are most likely many leftish varieties who privately disapprove of the suppression of academic freedom, but they go along with it anyway.

226 Thus the fact that many individual leftists are personally mild and pretty tolerant individuals by no means prevents leftism as a whole type having a totalitarian tendency.

227 Our discussion of leftism has a serious weakness. It continues to be removed from clear what we imply by the phrase "leftist." There would not appear to be a lot we are able to do about this. Today leftism is fragmented into a whole spectrum of activist movements. Yet not all activist movements are leftist, and some activist movements (e.g., radical environmentalism) seem to incorporate both personalities of the leftist kind and personalities of thoroughly un-leftist sorts who ought to know better than to collaborate with leftists. Styles of leftists fade out steadily into forms of non-leftists and we ourselves would usually be onerous-pressed to determine whether or not a given individual is or just isn't a leftist. To the extent that it is defined at all, our conception of leftism is defined by the discussion of it that we now have given in this text, and we are able to solely advise the reader to use his personal judgment in deciding who is a leftist.

228 But it is going to be useful to record some criteria for diagnosing leftism. These criteria cannot be applied in a cut and dried manner. Some individuals might meet a few of the standards without being leftists, some leftists may not meet any of the criteria. Again, you just have to use your judgment.

229 The leftist is oriented towards giant-scale collectivism. He emphasizes the responsibility of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a destructive attitude towards individualism. He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun management, for intercourse education and different psychologically "enlightened" educational strategies, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He tends to establish with victims. He tends to be in opposition to competition and towards violence, but he typically finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence. He's fond of using the common catch-phrases of the left, like "racism," "sexism," "homophobia," "capitalism," "imperialism," "neocolonialism," "genocide," "social change," "social justice," "social duty." Maybe the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the next movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL of those movements is almost definitely a leftist.[36]

230 The extra harmful leftists, that's, those who are most power-hungry, are often characterized by arrogance or by a dogmatic method to ideology. However, essentially the most harmful leftists of all may make certain oversocialized varieties who keep away from irritating displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, however work quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, "enlightened" psychological methods for socializing kids, dependence of the individual on the system, and so forth. These crypto-leftists (as we could name them) approximate certain bourgeois sorts as far as sensible action is anxious, however differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The peculiar bourgeois tries to carry individuals under control of the system so as to protect his way of life, or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional. The crypto-leftist tries to bring folks below control of the system because he's a true Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is differentiated from the typical leftist of the oversocialized sort by the truth that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he's more securely socialized. He's differentiated from the unusual effectively-socialized bourgeois by the truth that there is some deep lack within him that makes it vital for him to dedicate himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his (properly-sublimated) drive for energy is stronger than that of the typical bourgeois.

[34] This assertion refers to our specific model of anarchism. A wide variety of social attitudes have been called "anarchist," and it could also be that many who consider themselves anarchists would not accept our statement of paragraph 215. It should be famous, by the best way, that there's a nonviolent anarchist movement whose members probably wouldn't accept FC as anarchist and positively would not approve of FC's violent methods.

[35] Many leftists are motivated additionally by hostility, but the hostility most likely results partly from a pissed off want for energy.

[36] It is vital to understand that we imply someone who sympathizes with these MOVEMENTS as they exist immediately in our society. One who believes that ladies, homosexuals, etc., ought to have equal rights is just not necessary a leftist. The feminist, gay rights, etc., movements that exist in our society have the particular ideological tone that characterizes leftism, and if one believes, for instance, that ladies ought to have equal rights it doesn't necessarily observe that one should sympathize with the feminist motion as it exists at the moment.

In the event you beloved this information as well as you desire to acquire details concerning onlyspanking.video kindly stop by our internet site.